YouTube will now Pay you up to $10,000 for Creating Popular Shorts
Users will have access to all of the same tools found in the web-based version of YouTube Studio, like the timeline editor, filters, music, and more. And if I could accomplish the same change in my view of the world by reading a 60-page version of your argument, why didn’t you just publish a book this length instead? The honest answer to this last question should disappoint everyone: Publishers can’t charge enough money for 60-page books to survive; thus, writers can’t make a living by writing them. They'll then have until the 25th of that month to claim the money. YouTube is giving out the money as an incentive for creators who use its TikTok-style Shorts platform. YouTube earlier this year announced a $100 million fund that will pay those who make popular Shorts, which rolled out fully to 100 countries last month. Creators who qualify for payments will be notified the second week of each month via the YouTube app. Creators will also be able to fill in content by using the Shorts camera.
A few pundits argue that there will be a mixed model which seems most likely at least in the short term. Additionally, channels must have uploaded at least one eligible Short in the last 180 days. There are some stipulations: the content must be original---no videos re-uploaded from other platforms such as TikTok, or any that feature watermarks; creators need to be over 13, and anyone under 18 needs a parent or guardian to set up their AdSense account, link it to the creator's channel and accept the terms. While short-form videos are having a moment, flourishing on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, other platforms like Instagram are struggling to capitalize. Why it matters: How would you like to earn $10,000 per month? YouTube never revealed the required minimum viewer numbers as they change each month. From now throughout 2022, "thousands of eligible creators" can claim between $100 and $10,000 every month based on how many people watch their content and specific engagement metrics. And so the book is perhaps the best place to publish and write complex ideas so that they can be read and understood.
If your book is 600-pages-long, you are demanding more of my time than I feel free to give. But readers are beginning to feel that this shouldn’t be their problem. Similarly, but for different reasons, manuals, non-fiction works - I’m thinking specifically of text books - might also be best served in digital format allowing readers to take advantage of the quality of hypertext and the ability to easily search indices. Worse, many readers believe that they can just jump on YouTube and watch the author speak at a conference, or skim his blog, and they will have absorbed most of what he has to say on a given subject. Furthermore, creators can add additional footage as needed from their gallery if it does not meet the 60-second requirement. Creators can head to the YouTube Studio app and choose from any long-form video in their library, select up to 60 seconds, and create Shorts. Facebook and Instagram; Pinterest has a $500,000 fund; and TikTok's has $200 million ready for US creators. Data was g enerat ed by GSA Conte nt Generat or Demoversion!
From now on, YouTube will make it easier for creators to make Shorts, allowing them to take existing content in their library, edit it, and upload their new creations to YouTube. Books of a certain quality, books that seem destined for the airport lounge or bus stop, will perhaps be consigned straight to ebook. Interestingly Harris goes on to discuss his success in publishing a $1.99 ebook. Sam Harris talks about the pressure facing the (print) publishing industry. In some cases this is true and suggests an enduring problem for the business of publishing. Of course this doesn’t address the problems of physical publishing and the work involved in marketing, editing and distributing both physical and digital content by publishers. For an established author it may actually be easier to independently publish work in digital format. Nicholas Carr in his excellent book The Shallows examines the way reading on the screen is in fact shaping the way we think. The book as an object is well suited to deep reading. There are lots of arguments about the future of the book with most arguments settling on the side of digital. It would seem a shame to lose complex, rich prose, and possibly our capacity to read and understand it, because there isn’t a suitable economic model for the book.
Here is more about youtube shorts look into our own page.
Post a Comment for "YouTube will now Pay you up to $10,000 for Creating Popular Shorts"